What’s the place of the commercial publishers in an online world where services like Wikipedia are delivering free content? The battle - real or perceived - between the open content movement and commercial publishing was the topic of an session today hosted by the International Publishers Association (IPA).
Introducing the session, IPA president Ana Maria Cabanellas (pictured) put forward her view that publishers were in the content business rather than the print business, and that ‘we have to treat the internet as just another opportunity.’
So, what does ‘free’ actually mean? Mathias Schindler of the Wikimedia Foundation - the non-profit organisation that runs Wikipedia - said Wikipedia’s content was ‘free’ in the sense that users had the freedom to copy, modify and distribute it , even for commercial reasons. This was a subtly different definition of ‘free’ to that used in the phrase ‘free beer,’ he said.
‘There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch,’ said Bernd Kreissig of Brockhaus Duden Neue Medien, quoting Robert A Heinlein’s famous phrase (now reduced in our online age to the somewhat bland acronym TANSTAAFL). Nothing is free to produce, he noted, and in a funding model where the user isn’t paying for the content, there’s more risk that the end content will be unreliable or incomplete. ‘There’s no reliability without liability,’ he asserted rather neatly. Still, Kreissig wasn’t saying there was no place for free content, rather that free and paid content needed to co-exist rather as volunteer and professional fire-fighting service co-existed in his native Germany. Volunteers had a vital role, but no-one would argue that a professional service wasn’t needed.
Dr Jan Hylen, a consultant on Open Education Resources for the OECD, described the growth of the open content movement in universities, where lecture notes, sound and video recordings and other materials were increasingly being offered online. He defined Open Education Resources as ‘digitised material offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and re-use for teaching, learning and research.’ There was a global movement to create this material, he said, and while it was not cost-free, universities saw it as a way of promoting their research, reputations, and leveraging the tax-payers money they received.
Should commercial publishers be worried? Not so, said Hylen. Such material was a supplement to, not a replacement for, textbooks. He referred the meeting to the OECD document Giving Knowledge for Free for more information.
The meeting was also treated to a colourful talk from the Executive Director of the South African Publishers Association, Dudley Schroeder. A former teacher, Schroeder made a powerful plea for the kind of high quality textbooks and teachers resources which had proven essential in reducing inequities in the South African educational system, and increasing inexperienced teachers’ capacity to teach. Such textbooks, which ensure ‘that real learning takes place,’ could only be produced by a competitive, professional publishing sector, he argued.